Also an article at Maximum PC. I am a little concerned now! Just ordered my new system. Should I have waited? Is this a REAL problem? Do you think Intel or Digital Storm will do something to correct the problem in the future?
Here is part of the article*********
After a ton of speculation, a bit of denial, and a ton of testing we finally
have our answer. The thermal interface material change made by Intel when it
went from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge is indeed the cause of the excessive
temperatures we’ve observed while overclocking. The first accusation was made in
late-April by Overclockers.com, however proving it wasn’t easy. The Japanese
division of PC Watch somehow managed to remove the integrated
heat spreader from a Core i7 3770k, along with the stock binding and grease.
They then proceed to replace it with aftermarket alternatives, and the results
speak for themselves.
The findings are undisputable. By swapping out the TIM with
OCZ Freeze and Coolaboratory Liquid Pro, they were able to lower the
temperatures by up to 18% off a stock clocked chip, and a whopping 23% when
overclocked from 3.5GHz to 4GHz. Chips with the aftermarket TIM were also able
to sustain higher core voltages, which of course will lead to better
overclocking potential.
The report concludes that Intel’s decision to move away from
the fluxless solder used in Sandy Bridge has unfortunately crippled the
overclocking potential of this generation of CPU’s. Its possible Intel may
eventually change the design back, however with AMD lagging pretty far behind
these days they really don’t have much incentive to do so. Enthusiasts really
only have one place to shop for CPU’s these days.
Ivy Bridge is still an amazing push forward performance wise,
it’s just unfortunate that the potential for even more is there and we can’t get
at it.
cusafr